“It’s been clear from the very beginning that we’re not going along with the code of conduct,” Ellen Tauscher, undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, said during a Jan. 12 breakfast with reporters in Washington.
Asked why the U.S. government would not sign the document, Tauscher said, “It’s too restrictive.”
The European Union has been working the voluntary code of conduct for several years. The document lays out rules of the road for operating satellites and other space vehicles as space becomes increasingly congested, the idea being to minimize the chances of collisions or misunderstandings that could escalate.
The code also focuses on space debris mitigation, an area that began getting greater public attention in 2007 after China destroyed one of its own orbiting satellites with a ground-launched missile.
“We made it very definitive that we were not going to go ahead with the European Code of Conduct; what we haven’t announced is what we’re going to do, but we will be doing that soon,” Tauscher said.
Up to now, the U.S. government has been circumspect about its intentions with regard to the code. In April, for example, Ambassador Greg Schulte, U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense for space policy, described the code as a “positive approach” but stressed that the U.S. government had not yet decided whether to sign the document.
Some U.S. lawmakers have raised concerns that the nonbinding agreement would tie the U.S. military’s hands in space.
“We’ve advanced further technologically in development and actual deployment of these systems than anyone else, and agreements [and] codes of conduct tend to … constrain our military,” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said during a hearing on the subject in May.
“We had never said we were going to do it; we just hadn’t said ‘no,’” Tauscher said.
Hinting at new U.S.-written rules of the road for space, Taushcer said, “You wouldn’t be surprised to find out that we’ve found a nice sweet spot.”
The Pentagon had concerns with the European strategy for space traffic management, but there are also “ways to deal with it,” according to Michael Krepon, co-founder of the Stimson Center, a think tank here.
The U.S. Defense Department did a lengthy assessment of the code of conduct and particular provisions reviewed “would make sense for our national security.”
“If the satellite is stealthy, or we want it to be stealthy, how does that fit into a traffic management system?” he said.
“Now you argue … major spacefaring nations can figure out the orbital characteristics of objects in space, but it you want to move an object in space do you provide advance notice of this or how do you handle that?”
If the Obama administration is going ahead with a new strategy, then the Pentagon’s concerns have likely been addressed, Krepon said.
Asked why the U.S. government would not sign the document, Tauscher said, “It’s too restrictive.”
The European Union has been working the voluntary code of conduct for several years. The document lays out rules of the road for operating satellites and other space vehicles as space becomes increasingly congested, the idea being to minimize the chances of collisions or misunderstandings that could escalate.
The code also focuses on space debris mitigation, an area that began getting greater public attention in 2007 after China destroyed one of its own orbiting satellites with a ground-launched missile.
“We made it very definitive that we were not going to go ahead with the European Code of Conduct; what we haven’t announced is what we’re going to do, but we will be doing that soon,” Tauscher said.
Up to now, the U.S. government has been circumspect about its intentions with regard to the code. In April, for example, Ambassador Greg Schulte, U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense for space policy, described the code as a “positive approach” but stressed that the U.S. government had not yet decided whether to sign the document.
Some U.S. lawmakers have raised concerns that the nonbinding agreement would tie the U.S. military’s hands in space.
“We’ve advanced further technologically in development and actual deployment of these systems than anyone else, and agreements [and] codes of conduct tend to … constrain our military,” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said during a hearing on the subject in May.
“We had never said we were going to do it; we just hadn’t said ‘no,’” Tauscher said.
Hinting at new U.S.-written rules of the road for space, Taushcer said, “You wouldn’t be surprised to find out that we’ve found a nice sweet spot.”
The Pentagon had concerns with the European strategy for space traffic management, but there are also “ways to deal with it,” according to Michael Krepon, co-founder of the Stimson Center, a think tank here.
The U.S. Defense Department did a lengthy assessment of the code of conduct and particular provisions reviewed “would make sense for our national security.”
“If the satellite is stealthy, or we want it to be stealthy, how does that fit into a traffic management system?” he said.
“Now you argue … major spacefaring nations can figure out the orbital characteristics of objects in space, but it you want to move an object in space do you provide advance notice of this or how do you handle that?”
If the Obama administration is going ahead with a new strategy, then the Pentagon’s concerns have likely been addressed, Krepon said.
Posts
